Can a property owner be held liable if they didn’t cause the hazardous condition?

https://youtu.be/LTpWabMjXHU

In the attached video, David Wolff explains why property owners can be held liable for hazardous conditions, even if they didn’t directly create them.

Many people assume that property owners are only responsible for accidents if they caused the hazardous condition. However, the law in New York State holds property owners accountable even when they didn’t create the dangerous situation. For instance, if a customer spills something in a supermarket, or if ice forms on a sidewalk due to weather conditions, the property owner can still be held responsible if they didn’t take reasonable steps to address the hazard in a timely manner.

It may seem unfair that a property owner can be held liable for a condition they didn’t create, but the law requires them to maintain a safe environment and address hazards that arise from regular use of their property. In the case of ice forming on a sidewalk, for example, the property owner should know when to salt and clear the walkways to prevent injuries. Similarly, if a hazardous spill is noticed, it’s the store owner’s responsibility to ensure it’s cleaned up before anyone gets hurt.

However, proving liability in these cases can be tricky. It’s essential to show that the property owner either knew or should have known about the dangerous condition and failed to take action. This is where an experienced attorney becomes crucial. We understand how insurance companies operate and know exactly how to gather the necessary evidence to strengthen your case.

If you’ve been injured due to a hazardous condition on someone else’s property, don’t wait to seek legal help. Call us today at 716-848-8000 for a free consultation. Our team at Caner Wolf, NeCastro & Hall is here to fight for your rights and make sure you receive the compensation you deserve. We win—it’s just that simple.